FASB Chairman Steps Down

Yesterday, Robert Herz, Chairman of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), announced his resignation amidst a number of critical issues requiring resolution by the board.  It is interesting timing given that Mr. Herz had two years remaining for his term as Chairman.  It certainly adds to the uncertainty about the direction the board will take in the areas of mark-to-market accounting and the convergence of GAAP and IFRS.  Here is the Wall Street Journal's view.

Mr. Herz's departure, set for Oct. 1, also comes as the body is enmeshed in a battle over a proposal to expand the use of mark-to-market accounting, which requires companies to use market prices rather than management estimates to value financial holdings. Some investors say this practice brings a more realistic view to the numbers that public companies report, but banks have vigorously opposed the practice. They say it will introduce unnecessary volatility into results and exacerbated the financial crisis.

At the same time, Mr. Herz's departure may affect the board's ability to complete projects designed to bring together its rules and those set by the London-based International Accounting Standards Board. Mr. Herz's long-stated goal was to make both accounting regimes similar enough that U.S. public companies could abide by the international standards.

Mr. Herz may be stepping down now rather than succumb to continuing political pressure being placed on the board. We may never know if that is the case, but one thing is for certain - the new Chairman will certainly have his or her hands full when they begin their term.

The Straw That May Break a Bank's Back

Last week, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") adopted changes to off balance sheet accounting standards that previously permitted many financial institutions to obfuscate their true financial condition.  The changes will require companies to consolidate special purpose entities onto their balance sheet for reporting purposes.  Here is what BusinessWeek reported on the impact of the accounting changes.

In general, companies transfer assets from balance sheets to special purpose entities to insulate themselves from risk or to finance a large project. Under the change by the FASB, many qualifying special purpose entities will have to be moved back to a company's main balance sheet.

Outside investors often take stakes in those entities, for example, making an investment in a bank's holdings of mortgage loans in exchange for payments from borrowers. Under the new standard, companies must bring back onto their balance sheets any entity in which they hold an interest that gives them "control over the most significant activities," according to FASB. Companies must perform analyses to determine that.

The change could result in about $900 billion in assets being brought onto the balance sheets of the 19 largest U.S. banks, according to federal regulators. The information was provided by Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and 17 other institutions during the government's recent "stress tests," which were designed to determine which banks would need more capital if the economy worsened.

The changes take effect at the beginning of 2010 and certainly will require a great deal of work on the part of financial institutions to ensure they have the necessary capital to shoulder the added burden.  In addition, it will require strong quantitative and qualitative analysis to determine the need to bring assets back on the balance sheet.  As a result, this change could prove to be the straw that breaks the back of some banks.